|
|
WinMan
helps EGL
Homecare
stay ahead of
the
competition
Terry Dearlove is EGL’s Managing Director and has been with the company for 17 years.
Consequently, he has first hand experience of how the market has changed and the increased
challenges this has presented, not just to EGL but to all companies in this sector. “Perhaps the
biggest challenge is the ever shortening nature of customer lead times,” observes Dearlove.
“They have effectively reduced by half in the past 5 years and we’re now down to 3 days at the
outset. In an industry where quality, price and service determine who wins and who loses,
service is increasingly the key factor. So it is vital we can be flexible enough in our
manufacturing to keep ahead of our customers’ demands.”
EGL Homecare Limited is a European market leader in the field of sponges, scourers and non woven
cloths. The company, based in Shoeburyness, Essex, has grown solidly since its formation in 1979. It now
employs around 250 full and part time staff, and boasts a turnover in excess of £22 million.
With a UK market share of over 75% in the allpurpose wiping cloths (retail) sector, and a 60% share
in the scourer/sponge sector, EGL serves most of the major supermarket and retail groups, with a split of
80% manufactured and 20% factored products.
When it became apparent that its existing system was becoming a key constraint to business growth,
EGL found the ideal solution in WinMan.
This very demanding service regime necessitates that the entire production process runs as
efficiently as possible – from receiving raw materials, through to primary and secondary
manufacture, cutting/shaping, packing, storage and ultimately through to delivery. As Dearlove
remarks, “any problem at any stage can cause horrific knock-on effects.” The problems are no
different to those faced by many manufacturers:- late delivery of raw materials, human and
machine resource planning and scheduling problems, movement of Work in Progress (WIP)
through the factory etc. Dearlove points out another very obvious difficulty. “The problem with
the majority of our goods is that they are high bulk, low-value products, which can impact
disproportionately on any element of storage and distribution. The ideal would be a Just-in-Time
(JIT) operation, but this is impossible in this market. We therefore have to be as agile as
possible.”
Other specific problems came hand-in-hand with the increased growth that EGL was
experiencing. The higher manufacturing levels put greater strain on the company’s IT control
systems with key weaknesses such as lack of plant visibility, and works order progress,
becoming increasingly evident. Dearlove doesn’t pull his punches when it comes to identifying
the reason. “In essence, we were trying to run a manufacturing company with an accounts
package. Our Pegasus Opera system simply wasn’t up to our growing need for accurate stock
control, replenishment plans, and general workflow planning. It couldn’t provide any of the
visibility that we needed.”
The actual decision to replace the Pegasus system came about after EGL employed the services
of an external consultant, David Fisher, to look at the operating systems for managing the entire
manufacturing process with a view to a large-scale modernisation program. This involved a 6-
The scale of the challenge becomes
apparent when you consider that EGL
produces in excess of 1.25 million retail
selling units a week, where each unit can
range from 1 bath sponge to 20 sponge
scourers. This requires a continual flow of
15 to 20 truckloads a day and the utilisation
of the most advanced manufacturing
machinery in Europe. For example, to meet
production demands, EGL has two highspeed
converting machines that cut and
stack 900 cloths per minute. These
machines are linked to a base production
line running 24x7.
Similarly, the latest foam cutting
equipment is in place – some of which is
bespoke – enabling EGL to respond to
retail customer demands on design as well
as volume. “If the scale of production isn’t
daunting in itself” comments Dearlove,
“we are also currently working to targeted
service levels in excess of 98.5%; that’s
‘on time, in full’”.
The scale of the challenge becomes apparent
when you consider that EGL produces in
excess of 1.25 million retail selling units a
week, where each unit can range from 1 bath
sponge to 20 sponge scourers.
month business process mapping exercise that was completed in January 2001. Fisher’s
comments confirmed the opinion held by senior management, namely that EGL urgently needed
a manufacturing IT solution that would (i) be able to meet the growing challenges of the
company’s stock control requirements; (ii) provide a Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
methodology without any of the superfluous elements of many MRP systems; and (iii) allow a
strategic focus on production planning.
The selection process began with both Dearlove and Fisher visiting various manufacturing trade
shows. It was at one of these events that they came across SSL WinMan. An initial list of
solutions was reduced to a shortlist including WinMan, with each of the three solutions being put
through a rigorous selection procedure involving off-site reference visits, on-site presentations
and input from representatives from each key department within EGL. Dearlove summarises
why SSL WinMan was the clear winner. “There were a number of reasons including the quality
of the presentation, the knowledge of the team and the fact that out of everyone, SSL WinMan
seemed to be the company that had its feet most on the ground and remained focused on our
business issues. However, what impressed us the most was the sheer ease of use of the system.
This was essential for us because at the time we had a relatively low level of IT literacy in the
company. The Windows format made it something everyone could immediately identify with
and feel comfortable with.”
The formal decision was finally taken in June 2001 and EGL embarked on an implementation
process. In and of itself this proved to bring significant value to the company, as Dearlove
explains. “We retained the services of David Fisher to work with SSL WinMan for the
implementation, and the scale of limitations we had been living with using Pegasus soon became
obvious. The WinMan system provided us with levels of data analysis and visibility of our
business processes in a way we hadn’t envisaged. Consequently, we had to do a lot of unplanned
work simply to collate the data the new system would require. By doing so however, we were
able to streamline a number of the ways we could operate as a company.” The system
implementation was accompanied by suitable hardware upgrades to further allow for EGL’s
anticipated growth.
It wasn’t just a technological change that EGL had to undergo, there was quite a cultural
upheaval that had to be managed. Any implementation requires an element of re-training, and
EGL chose to train each key department leader and then have them in turn train their department.
“This helped create a large element of buy-in from the entire staff,” remarks Dearlove. This was
crucial for EGL because not only would the new system require more accurate information input
by those using it, it would also highlight more accurately any inefficiencies within the workforce.
Dearlove continues, “We knew that the entire company would have to work differently once we
went live, so we endeavoured to prepare everyone for the changes that would be required.”
The cultural change did prove to be the biggest difficulty when the system went live in February
2002, for the very reasons which had been anticipated. It soon became clear that the system was
indeed highlighting inefficiencies across the company. “Fortunately, most people recognised that
this actually was a way to help the company as a whole because it truly showed how everyone’s
actions impacted on everyone else,” explains Dearlove. “We did have a minority that blamed the
system, but the reality soon became clear that as internal disciplines improved this wasn’t the
case, and in turn it became very easy to say, ‘There are no WinMan errors’ because there simply
weren’t.”
Any suspicions about the validity of the system began evaporating after 2-3 months as people
began to find out for themselves that they could not only trust the figures and information that
WinMan was generating, but that this also was having a positive impact on their work. For
example, prior to WinMan, there was so little trust in the stock figures that even if the system
said there were 2 items left in stock, employees would manually spend up to an hour trying to
physically locate the actual stock. In the same way, if the system said there were no stock items
left, people would still manually double check. “With WinMan, people began to take the
information at face value which had a considerable impact on their actual fulfilment in doing
their job,” exclaims Dearlove. He continues, “This had further benefits because people
increasingly began taking responsibility for what they did due to their increased confidence. It
also helped everyone to see the role they played in the bigger picture, which helped engender a
sense of mutual accountability. I see this as a key factor in helping EGL to undergo the growth it
has experienced over the past 2 years.”
With regard to Return on Investment
(ROI), Dearlove interestingly states that
for EGL, “the real ROI is evident all
around us, in everything we do. It’s
impossible to quantify the difference
it’s made.”
Would Dearlove make the same buying
decision again? “Definitely, and that’s
more important than ROI!”
“With WinMan, people began to take the
information at face value which had a
considerable impact on their actual fulfilment
in doing their job,” exclaims Dearlove. He
continues, “This had further benefits because
people increasingly began taking
responsibility for what they did due to their
increased confidence. It also helped everyone
to see the role they played in the bigger
picture, which helped engender a sense of
mutual accountability.
I see this as a key factor in helping EGL to
undergo the growth it has experienced over
the past 2 years.” - Terry Dearlove. Managing Director
|
|